Astrolog research
Astrology, tested the way you would test anything else
Hypotheses written down before the data is joined. Base rates stated first. Every denominator shown, and null results published at the same size as everything else. If a claim does not survive that, we say so.
Published studies
Study 01 — Bitcoin's birth chart vs. 15 years of price →
The genesis block gives Bitcoin the best-timestamped natal chart in existence: 2009-01-03 18:15:05 UTC, cryptographically fixed. We pre-registered 17 location-independent hypotheses and tested them against 5,479 days of real BTC/USD closes. 0 of 17 beat chance.
Study 02 — NVIDIA's IPO chart vs. 27 years of price →
One asset is an anecdote, so we ran the same 14 hypotheses again on a different chart and a different market: 6,937 NVDA sessions since the 1999 IPO. The null replicated — nothing survived correction. Along the way it settled something: an IPO has a location but no recorded time, and across the plausible first-trade window the Ascendant sweeps four whole signs. Both subjects turn out to have no usable angles, for opposite reasons.
Readings
A study asks whether a claim survives testing. A reading asks what the chart says. We publish both, and we link each to the other — so the interpretation never arrives without the evidence about it.
The astrological life of Bitcoin →
The full interpretive reading of the chart Study 01 tested: 13 natal aspects, 209 outer-planet passages across 6,443 days, and all 17 solar returns, laid against real BTC/USD price history and the dated record. No Ascendant and no houses anywhere — the genesis block has no location, so they are undefined rather than unknown.
It is interpretation, not prediction. It carries no forecasts, and it links straight back to the null result above.